As a constitutional conservative, I have an issue with nominating a candidate who was the forefather of government mandated ObamaCare. But, we are now seeing the lame-stream media toss Mitt-for-Brains Romney out to the masses as the “presumptive Republican front-runner” after his “VICTORY” in New Hampshire.
Last time I checked, there are 50 (not 57!) states in the Union. Some fuzzy math calculations courtesy of my public school education indicates that winning 2 states out of 50 equates to a whopping 4%. ABC news estimated that only 25% of the eligible NH voting population actually voted in last evening’s primary. So, 75% of eligible electorate sat at home while ABC declared that Mitt won “decisively”. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/hampshire-primary-mitt-romney-win-hampshire-primary-abc/story?id=15334016#.Tw2ohYGcySo
In case you were not aware, here are some facts about New Hampshire to show why this so-called “victory” should have been classified as politically irrelevant:
• 9th least populous of the 50 states;
• 44th in size among the 50 states;
• Proudly boasting to be the 5th state to bring you same-sex marriage;
• Provided “Jon Hunstsman” with a third place finish in the 2012 primary!
Yes, this is the same Jon Huntsman who worked for the Obama administration as the Ambassador to the People’s Republic of China.
-Milan G. Marinkovich